Quality and Value: Measuring and Utilizing Both in Your Practice: Page 2 of 2
Lowell E Schnipper, MD, PhD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA) followed Dr Chiang’s presentation with a discussion of the ASCO Value Framework that he and his colleagues on the ASCO Value in Cancer Task Force developed to help inform treatment decision-making.
Dr Schnipper said that the development of new therapies for cancer care has produced promising results in recent years, going so far as to say that they have changed the entire landscape of care. However, he added that the costs of these new therapies have also risen in such a way that they have become unaffordable for middle-class families.
What the Value Framework is intended to do is take elements of care doctors already view as being important—clinical benefit, toxicity, cost—and make them part of the discussion at the point of care for patients. This is especially important for patients who may be less interested in survival and more interested in other factors such as quality of life.
However, Dr Schnipper did acknowledge that the framework in its current form is severely limited, mainly because it must be used manually, which can take time and may be difficult to explain to patients. The end goal of the framework, and what ASCO is currently working towards, is partnering with a software developer to turn the framework into an app that can provide data in real time at the point of care. He added that integrating the framework into clinical pathways could also be an effective way of ensuring that patient-provider conversations take place and providing better value-based outcomes.
To close the session, Steven L D’Amato, BCOP, RPH, discussed the current benefits and challenges associated with ASCO’s QOPI by using his own practice as an example.
In 2007, Mr D’Amato explained that his practice was one of the first that took steps toward QOPI certification. To achieve QOPI certification, institutions must exceed a quality score higher than 75%. In reaching that goal, Mr D’Amato’s practice faced two critical issues. The first was the fact that his institution was not utilizing a completely paperless electronic health records system. This slowed their ability to effectively track and measure outcomes. The second was an issue with ensuring adherence to oral medications. Both of these issues were identified after initial assessment with QOPI and solved after the implementation of appropriate programs in clinical care.
Still, Mr D’Amato added that his practice has probably not saved money through achieving QOPI certification. It took a dedicated staff just to analyze quality metric charts and identify ways to improve care practices; but he stressed that it has absolutely improved care delivery, which he viewed as an area of paramount importance.
Mr D’Amato concluded by illustrating the potential value of QOPI for all health care stakeholders, including payers, providers, and patients, all of which benefit from a health care system that delivers more value-based care.—Sean McGuire